Well, actually they do want more troops in Iraq, but it’s just that commanders want so many more, that another 30,000 may as well be zero. The problem once again is rhetoric. Military commanders are loudly sounding off that they do not want more troops in Iraq. How does this reconcile with claims by these same military commanders and analysts that we went in with too few troops?
Observe this behind closed doors exchange with the Decider:
Bush: How many more do you boys need to pacify Iraq? I’m all ears and willing to do what it takes to go forward.
Commander: 300,000 minimum. We coulda done it with less going in, but now we’re going to need to ramp up to 500,000 to get the job done.
Bush: Hmmm, I hear ya. I hear ya, but I can only spare you 30,000. 30,000 more is all the political capital I have to spend. Politics won’t allow me to send more than 30,000. Ya see, that number 30,000? It’s all I can send. I’ve decided.
Commander: Well then you can keep ’em. Don’t send ANY then. 30,000 is like zero – exactly like zero, except that there are going to be more bodies sent home. Casualties will increase with zero increase in effectiveness.
Bush: Son, listen, this is politics. You just be a good soldier and put these boys to good use in the war on terror, guarding Haliburton facilities, etc. We’re going to win, you hear! I’ve decided it!
Commander: Whatever you say, sir. *salutes leaves*